I created a new article on a 2 month old site, and started getting traffic within 24 hours from Google. In the first two weeks, that page was found at Google for 60 DIFFERENT search phrases.

Was this a fluke?

Nope!

I simply created content the way the search engines like it. Move your mouse over the top right hand corner of this page. Those case studies will give you a unique glimpse of how search engines rank your pages.

 

Greed has given birth to an array of time-saving solutions, that require a lot of hard "unadvertised work" just to get any decent return on the investment.

The biggest problem facing anyone trying to build a successful website is how to create useful content that people actually want to read. Doing this takes time, and most beginners don't want to put the effort in. After all, making money on the internet is easy, isn't it? Well it is if you believe the people trying to sell you the next get rich quick course, eBook or software.

I'll tell you this now. Making money on the internet is not easy, and does require work.

This problem is multiplied many times over when a webmaster attempts to build a site in a niche he is not familiar with. How on earth can they write content for a niche they know nothing about?

Enter the "Quick Fix" solutions.

How many times have you received emails recommending the latest membership site (PLR) that offers "x articles per week"?

Unfortunately, solutions like this actually require more effort to get them to work, and many webmasters end up never making the investment back.

Membership sites offering PLR content, offer the same PLR content to 100s of members. If all members posted that content on their own sites, that would be 100s of duplicate articles floating around. Why would Google, Yahoo or MSN rank your article above the other ones?

The fact is, no matter how well written PLR content is, you will need to re-write it to get any benefit at all. When I say re-write it, I mean every word, not just changing the word "benefit" to "advantage", or "little" to "tiny". Search engines are far too clever to fall for that old trick.

Let's look at it from another point of view.

If 100 people have an article written by a PLR site on "alsatian dogs", then all 100 articles will basically be saying the same thing. If someone types "alsatian dogs" into Google, do you think Google will return all 100 articles, when basically they are all identical in terms of the information they provide?

I would suggest that what Google wants, is to provide a broad spectum of information on "alsatian dogs", so may well look for pages that offer something different. In that case, only 1 of the 100 may be shown.

Now, before you start thinking that Google wont be able to filter out articles in this manner, think again. With Latent Semantic Indexing, Google now have the power to find content that more closely matches the phrases entered by searchers.

For example, if someone typed in "Alsatian dog" at Google, Google would look for pages in its index that contained words like:

alsatian, dog, german, shepherd, germanshepherd, dogs, breed, puppies

If the PLR content did not contain those words, your page would not even be considered.

What if someone typed in the phrase "train alsatian dog"?

Would your PLR content be able to rank for that phrase? Probably not, unless it was specificall about training alsatian dogs, and even then, you would be competing against 100s of other people with the exact same PLR article you bought.

In this particular example, Google would be looking for words in the content like:

training, alastian, dog, trainer, dogs, dogtraining, breed, alastian, classes, train, puppies, course, learning, dog's, education, trainers

These are actual synonyms returned from Google when I do that search.

The plain fact is, for content to do well in the search engines, it must:

It is possible to turn PLR content into something that matches these criteria, but each and every article will take a lot of work to achieve this, which makes you wonder what value the content has in the first place. If it has to be 100% re-written, then why not just grab content from free article sites and re-write it in your own words?

What about the services that offer to write unique content for you, or individual writers that you can hire at places like elance or rentacoders?

Well, you might strike gold and find someone who will write beautiful articles for $5 a peice. However, there will always be a nagging doubt at the back of your mind about the article, especially if it is of a very high quality. You can check to see if the article has been copied off the internet by using a service like Copyscape, but what if the writer copied the articles out of a book on the subject. Imagine being issued with legal papers demanding compensation after you published content you thought you owned.

Hiring content authors is a minefield. You need to know what you are doing, and be able to trust the author 100%. If you can do that, you may be fine, but you will need to give those authors detailed instructions on what the article must be about, and which words must appear in the content. In many cases, it is often easier, and quicker to write the content yourself.

At least you wont have to worry about legal papers landing on your doorstep...

The biggest objection I hear from my own newsletter subscribers is that they can't write articles, or they don't feel confident writing about a particular topic, because they don't have the kowledge.

 

The "Creating Fat Content Course" aims to equipe webmasters with both the knowledge, and the tools necessary for easily creating high-quality content, that the search engines will love.

Michael Campbell said:

"These unique tools are based on Dr. Williams research. They concentrate on all the "on-page factors" that boosts content into the top 10 results at Google.

With Fat Content your pages are naturally filled with long tail keywords. So instead of having just one or two phrases in an article, you can have dozens of phrases, and get found for them all. In addition, the articles you write will be considered "more relevant" than ones that are focused on just keyword density.
"

..

"My conclusion...

The Fat Content System will help you write content that is well themed, thanks to the underlying LSI technology, and proprietary intelligence, for rating your content. It will help your pages get found for all sorts of long tail keywords, not just one or two primary phrases.

In addition, Fat Content gets weighted as more relevant than the competition, which leads to higher rankings. And the more keywords you have with higher rankings... the more traffic you'll get. That's always a good thing".

Michael Campbell
Internet Marketing Secrets

 

Unsolicited testimonials:

"By the way, I have been writing copy for over 30 years and feel pretty confident in my abilities. I have also looked at many many products and your Fat Content Course is by far and away the best program I have seen in this crazy and fun business.

If you are trying to make money on line and don't use the tools and instructions in this course you are making a huge mistake.

And price. I should be arrested for larceny. What unbelievable value.

Jim O'Brien

Jim goes on to say:

"I need to write articles for our two "working" web sites to improve search engine positioning on specific products and services we are selling to our hospitality and small business clients. I was having a very hard time finding a way to incorporate key words into my articles and still make them useful and creditable to a targeted and sophisticated audience. I was just bouncing all over the place and accomplishing little until I purchased your course.

As I followed your structure, everything seemed to fall into place and I began producing quality articles with the keyword density I need for good search engine placement. I use the templates and have even developed a few of my own. I have also tried several keyword programs and without a doubt, the combination of Wordtracker and Keyword Results Analyzer are by far and away the best combination I have seen. When you combine the Fat Content Creator and your really cool search engine browser with these tools you have the very best way to get your web sites great search engine rankings. They are a flat out 10.

Needless to say, I am a very satisfied customer".

Jim O'Brien
http://www.jamisonwebworks.com/

 

"Hi,

I'm enjoying your product, Fat Content Course, which I bought last week. Especially the Fat Content Creator
software - I've been looking for something like this in ages!

To try it out I took a PLR article I had, which had a quality theme score of 15% as it was, and decided to try and make it better without totally rewriting it.

I also wanted to spend as little time as possible doing it, or at least less time than I would normally take to write an article from scratch. If it takes me more time to rewrite a good article than I can do from scratch, then there isn't much point in using PLR articles!

I identified the theme words to use and set about the rewrite. However, I couldn't get the quality theme score above around 50%. I figured it probably wasn't too bad - better than it had started out at least.

Then I received your weekly newsletter reminding us that there were the two reports available showcasing several articles with your software.

I re-read them and realised that maybe I had approached the article rewrite all wrong. I took another look at the article and immediately saw that the main keyword
phrase was probably used too many times for a start.

Five minutes later I had thinned out a lot of the theme words, and the quality theme score leapt to a very impressive and satisfying 84.8%!

It would probably be possible to get it higher, but with the time spent it's probably easier to write a fresh article from scratch. I was trying to rewrite the article and get a high quality score in less time than writing a new article would take. In all I took around 25 minutes rewriting, which isn't too bad.

I've decided that I will use this article as it would appear that it should rank well for its not too competitive term. And unlike some PLR articles it's a reasonable length at 437 words.

This is really excellent software! It has told me something valuable in a very short time that would not have been very easy to spot otherwise.

Kind regards,

John Coutts".

 

Here is part of an email I received from a subscriber of my newsletter:

"I have planned out 9 websites, but don't have the time to create 100s of articles for each site. Can you tell me the best source of free or cheap content, so I can get these sites built?"

You know, many people think the same thing. How on earth can you create a website with 100s of pages when you have to create all of the content yourself?

Well, my answer is simple. You dont need dozens of sites, and you don't need 100s of pages per site. We all hear of people who use PLR content, or articles from free article sites to create 100 page websites overnight. Sounds to good to be true, doesn't it? Well, it is. Most of these sites wont rank well, and wont get any traffic, because they are not what the search engines are looking for.

To be successful, you need to change the way you think. You also need to stop listening to a large majority of marketers who tell you stuff, just to get you to buy their latest product.

The fact is, a 10 page website with quality, unique, and useful content can out-perform websites with 100s of pages. I see this with nearly every new site I build.

The number of pages a site has, does not guarantee a certain level of traffic.

I have tried building sites with PLR content, and free articles. They get almost no traffic. I even setup an article directory, which currently has around 3000 articles in it and has a PR 3.

Problem with the directory is that people submit the same article to numerous article sites, as they are only interested in inbound links to their own sites. You know how much traffic that 3000 article site is getting every day? Here is a screenshot from the stats program monitoring that site:

If you built a website with 3000 pages, you'd kind of expect more traffic, wouldn't you? In fact, this is the sort of traffic I might expect for a single page on a quality site.

The content on this article site is not unique, and much of it isn't useful. That site just doesn't attract good inbound links, and therefore doesn't rank well for very much at all. Since it's birth on March 20, 2006, my article site hasn't even made me enough money to pay for a meal for two at my local restaurant.

The good thing is, I believe these results are typical of sites built without quality, unique content.

Good thing? Why do I say that?

Simple. With so many people building sites like this, it means there is very little quality competition. For those webmasters who create quality sites, with nothing but quality content, the pickings are rich.

 

Building a website? Think Quality, Not Quantity

Your goal should be to create websites that will last for years, and attract good, targeted traffic, and that means quality, not quantity.

So what if an article takes you 45 minutes to write. That one article could end up making you $10 a month for the next 10 years. Imagine slowly building your web empire in this manner, until you have 100 articles like this? That would be a good one-year goal for a part-timer (2 articles per week).

For a full-timer, you could probably create a couple of articles a day, or around 600 articles a year. Now, multiple that up, and you have a good monthly income. This type of income is special, because it does not matter whether you stay at your home office and work, or go on holiday for the month. Your content is out there, working 24-7.

Isn't it time you stopped following the sheep, stopped thinking that quantity was the way forward, and started creating your own quality sites?

The course, and the accompanying software tools, will help you build high quality, themed content that ranks well for a wide range of phrases.

Here is a screenshot of the stats from one of my sites which has 13 pages (the site is actually a few pages bigger, but I am not counting privacy, sitemap etc. The site has 13 pages of pure quality content). The screenshot shows the end of a report which lists all of the phrases the site has been found for.

This report shows that the site was found 5316 times via the search engines, for 1429 different terms over a period of roughly 6 weeks. The top referrer report for this site shows where that traffic has come from:

You can see that traffic comes from all of the big three search engines, plus Aol Search, Ask Jeeves and CNet Search.

These figures for this 13 page site are typical for the sites I build. None stay at 10 or 15 pages, as all sites are works in progress, and I tend to add a new page of quality content to each site, once a month or so. As the site grows, it continues to be found for a diverse range of keyword phrases, while all the time, increasing in daily traffic.

This basic site originally took about 15 hours to build (including writing the content). Initially it was a 7 page site, with 4 more content pages being added over a period of several weeks after the initial site was completed.

The site will continue to grow, like all of my other sites, slowly, and over time. This site, like many of my other sites, get inbound links from other sites, without any action on my own part.

My sites get linked to from blogs, articles referring to content (or reports) on my site, and bookmarked at places like Stumble Upon. Most webmasters work hard on getting links like that, but my sites just attract them due to the high quality of my content.


An Article Experiment

I recently did a little experiment that I wrote about in my newsletter.

I created a webpage for one of my sites in a highly competitive niche, using the methods taught in this course.

The page was posted on my site, and getting traffic 24 hours later from Google. In fact, in the first 48 hours, that single page was found for 17 DIFFERENT search phrases.

Two weeks after its first inclusion in Google, I checked again. That single page had been found for 60 different search phrases in 2 weeks. THAT'S ONE PAGE.

The truth is, FAT CONTENT IS THE NEW SEO, and I can teach you how to write it!!

The "Creating Fat Content Course" will teach you how to write high quality, themed content (the kind of unique, valuable content that search engines prize, and people like to share with their friends).

Here is what the course contains:

1. 225 Page Training manual.

The training manual is packed with screenshots, diagrams, and easy to follow instructions.

It takes you through real examples of researching and writing content, and explores how you can make your content unique, valuable, and add value to the internet.

Throughout, you will be shown how to use the included software to research, write, and check the theme your content, the same way I write all of the content for my own web sites.

2. Fat Content Creator Software.

This software is the article editor.

The editor has various tools built in to help you check the quality of your content. You can see the "Keyword Map" feature in the screenshot.

You'll also have access the theme report, which checks your article to make sure it is well themed, and contains the keywords that the search engines will expect to find.

3. Dr. Andy's Internet Search Browser.

This research tool is very powerful, allowing you to quickly and easily find facts, figures, videos, images, etc, for your content.

4. Special Demo version of KRA, including the entire Keyword Research for the niche used in this course.

The course manual describes how to use this tool, to get at the right keywords for each piece of content you create.


5. Additional Files.

Contains several files mentioned during the course. Also includes a Server Side Include (SSI) primer, for those who want to learn this powerful tool.

 

6. Special Bonus - Content Publisher

Content Publisher is not the typical type of bonus you usually get when buy something. Content Publisher is the full version of the tool that currently sells for $97. You can see the sales page, and read more about what this tool does on the Content Publisher website.

 

This course will teach you the techniques you need to create quality , unique content, that will be found in the search engines, and bring you quality, targeted traffic.


I am so confident that you will love this course that I offer a 100% unconditional money back guarantee. Tell us that you are not completely satisfied within 30 days of purchase, and we will refund your money. We won't even ask you why!

That is a 100% no-risk offer!

 


The first 200 copies of the Fat Content Course
are available for just $197 $147 $127



Terms of Use | Privacy | Support


Dr. Andy Williams
Author of the popular and free ezSEO Newsletter and
ezSEO Blog

Hey Andy
I was one of the first few people to purchase the course today!

All I can say for now is Thank You, Thank You, Thank You!

It's a real pleasure to do business with someone that over delivers.

Under promised, over delivered, and under priced!


Thank You Again.
Carl Orris


It's taken me a little time to go through this, but here is my assessment: 

Your contents page is very well detailed and I find this very useful for quick reference.The overview of the entire procedure is useful as is the flowchart, because there is so much detail here the big picture is hard to grasp initially.I have purchased and used KRA and have easily followed along with your examples of its use. I have to say when I filter (for my own projects) there does not seem enough colors to cater for each data set. However this tool is extremely useful as before KRA I had battled wordtracker and lost hope due to it being so cumbersome.I did get a bit lost sometimes where you were using different sets of keywords and I found I had to re-orientate myself by looking at the screen shot of KRA and using the number of phrases found so I could deduce which database you were talking about. For instance on page 28 from looking at the phrases (7131) I went back to find that the original database was from the search on "dieting" and based on this you were doing the advanced filtering. If I didn't check this I would have lost where this information was from.The use of screen shots for showing what you should see and how you use information was quite critical in following along as I do a lot of reading away from my computer (on the train to and from work).I am amazed at the amount of detail you put into your explanations, this is an enormous help in interpreting exactly what you mean. Showing by example is excellent for reinforcement of these ideas. I have just finished my first website using your SEO website builder. A lot of what you show in this above package I used - so I am currently writing the second form of all my articles using your article editor. It is interesting using the keyword features to show you how well you think you've themed your page. It's definitely useful although the keyword map I find at the moment a little confusing to recall exactly what I am seeing, I think it just needs more familiarisation.There are a lot of explanations about the little things that come up - these things tend to stop you by making you confused. For example, the ordering of keywords within the article, what do you do when the keywords don't make sense & how do you fix these up / do you use them - all these things you answer. Very helpful.I found using the two different forms of an article excellent, because you show their differences and how you could write them based on similar information.The research browser blew me away because it just has so much in there, and I'd never heard of most of the sites it points to. I have used this sparingly as I was trying to focus on finishing my articles without getting too bogged down in how to use the software itself. It certainly pulls up lots of interesting information I simply would not find without a lot of trouble.I found that your templates for writing research very useful as it helps me to split up the information into useful chunks - good idea. You can easily go back and find the information.I found your area on resource boxes and how to submit articles with differing resource boxes really confusing (pages 176 and 177). Perhaps a diagram would be really useful here - I had to do this myself to make it easier to understand.Adding fat to the site was very useful. I guess I would like to be able to do some of this stuff with your website builder (I am not confident about touching templates) like adding RSS, SSI so it can be placed in the margins or at the bottom where the menu items are.I've also come across various pieces of software through your publications that are useful - like the open office suite, so just reading some of this information provides you with alternative avenues for doing things.Overall the package is very useful. It takes several readings to pull ideas together properly, but I constantly go back to particular areas to reread the processes.Related Issue - One thing I would like to be shown how to do is to create download pages to accept credit cards etc (I am starting to write some e-books, reports etc). I know there are expensive packages out there that go into detail about this, but they are really expensive. I have joined Nicheology recently and they touch on it but really, I guess you need a template and I don't know how to set up links so that you get the right things happening - can you possibly point me in the right direction to a site or information if you know of any.I hope this helps. Thanks very much.Regards

Robin Hill


Hello Dr. Andy,

I have made a few different purchases from you now.  I have been pleased with each and every one of them.  This course however, is absolutely top-notch.  I have been looking and brainstorming for so long about how to create my own, original content.  Many other sources only scratch the surface.  Your new course with software provided was more than worth the price I paid for it.

I feel that I no longer need to search for this information.  You have covered it all and I sincerely thank you for that.  I now feel more confident and ready to start my web career as a result.

You should note that there are some misspellings in the course.  It's the kind of misspellings that spell checkers cannot identify because of such words like 'red' and 'read.'  It was very comprehensible though and despite being almost 200 pages of course content (not including the appendix),  I devoured the course in a short two days.

Overall Rating: Superb!

Your continued output of quality software, courses, and e-zine remain my primary reason for trusting you when you make recommendations!  Thanks again.

Michael Alt